Emissions of the Lowest Acceptable Standard of Living
Hämta länk
Facebook
X
Pinterest
E-post
Andra appar
It is clear that our consumption leads to irreversible harm to our world. In this blog post I'll estimate the emissions for a person that lives on subsistence.
Another definition would be: The lowest standard of living any human being should have.
For Sweden, I've found two sources: The Enforcement Agency (Kronofogden) and The National Board for Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen). For simplicity, I'll follow the calculator from Socialstyrelsen that indicates whether one can qualify for subsidence support.
The subsistence consists of two parts:
Personal expenses for the individual, for example food and clothes.
Shared common expenses for the household, for example utility bills and newspapers.
I'll calculate the levels for a single adult.
Living: The guideline from Socialstyrelsen is one bedroom, one kitchen and one livingroom - roughly 60 square meters.
Electricity 1500 kWh per year
Monthly Personal Expenses - €410, in the following categories:
Media: €50 - subscription of a local newspaper and a book once in a while
Food €170 per month - A weekly menu with three servings of chicken, four servings of cod, two servings of halloumi and four vegetarian servings. Oatmeal porridge for breakfast
Clothes €40 - one sweater, or a pair of pants, or a half dozen of underwear.
20 - buying a cheap smartphone every second year and having a low cost subscription
50 SEK - buying one bottle of schampoo or toothpaste every month
The lowest acceptable living standard of any human being in Sweden exceeds by far the highest emission levels according that comply with the 1.5C target, according to the IPCC.
Does this mean that IPCC are too aggressive with their targets? No, we need to reach net-zero emissions and stop increasing the CO2e levels in the atmosphere now. (ASAP is too slow and failing can't be an option.
Should I aim for a below-subsidence lifestyle? No, it is an important target that you can lead a life on an acceptable standard. Especially with children.
What should I do? I'll aim for personal emissions between 50% and 75% of the Swedish average. The latest numbers I have from SCB (Statistics Sweden) indicates an average of 5.4 tonnes per person of emissions. Thus, my target will be between 2.7 and 4 tonnes of CO2e.
If you think that number is too high and that my ambition is too relaxed, you can reduce my target by reducing the average emission levels in Sweden.
A couple of months ago, I discussed how much land each of us would have, if the global land mass was distributed evenly. Now, I'll look at some important natural resources. Return of Investment When discussing resources and reserves, it is very important to distinguish them. I'll illustrate with an apple tree that provide me with apples to eat. The first apples that I pick are the big, juicy ones between one and two meters above the ground. Why those apples and not smaller, half rotten apples that lie on the ground or big apples five meters above the ground? The answer is Return of Investment . The effort (investment) of picking easily accessible, big and juicy apples is low and the returns are high. When all the low-hanging fruit is taken, I'll pick the slightly smaller and non-perfect apples. The returns are diminishing and thus the Return of Investment falls. Perhaps, I decide to go for the high-altitude apples, taking a risk of falling, buying a ladder or asking ...
As I predicted, I increased my personal CO2e emissions this year to 3.8 tonnes. This is mainly due to the relocation of me and my family to a house in Åkarp outside Malmö. We bought quite a lot of furniture, tools and services during the year. The pandemic reduced our travels and consumption, so this year wasn't as dirty as I feared. I compare my personal emissions with the average personal emissions in Sweden: In 2018, I emitted 4.7 tonnes, on par with the average of 4.8 tonnes. (98%) In 2019, I emitted 2.9 tonnes. The data from SCB isn't available yet, but if I extrapolate the falling trend, the average would be 4.6 tonnes. (~63%) In 2019, I emitted 3.8 tonnes. The data from SCB isn't available yet, but extrapolated values together with a pandemic makes a very rough guess at 4 tonnes (95%). It is clear that there will be some restrictions in 2021, so I expect to have quite low emissions this year. However, my family has relatives abroad, so there is some likelihood for l...
Promise One year ago, I promised to reduce my personal consumption based CO2e emissions from 4.7 tonnes to 3.8 tonnes. Result In 2019, my personal consumption based CO2e emissions was 2.9 tonnes - a reduction of 1.8 tonnes. Together with the public emissions of 3.8 tonnes, that gives a total of 6.6 tonnes of CO2e. I've honored my NYE resolution but my emission levels are far from sustainable. The average in Sweden is some 6 tonnes of personal consumption based CO2e emissions, so I'm a bit below the average but still higher than the one tonne target from IPCC. My emission levels are not OK! However, I've reached the conclusion that this issue is larger than the sum of individuals and their actions. While some individuals stop flying, others keep flying and governments build new airports and expand existing ones. Individuals buy electric bikes, while governments builds pipelines and can't decide whether to expand oil refineries or not. Get me right - the con...
Kommentarer
Skicka en kommentar