Emissions of the Lowest Acceptable Standard of Living
Hämta länk
Facebook
X
Pinterest
E-post
Andra appar
It is clear that our consumption leads to irreversible harm to our world. In this blog post I'll estimate the emissions for a person that lives on subsistence.
Another definition would be: The lowest standard of living any human being should have.
For Sweden, I've found two sources: The Enforcement Agency (Kronofogden) and The National Board for Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen). For simplicity, I'll follow the calculator from Socialstyrelsen that indicates whether one can qualify for subsidence support.
The subsistence consists of two parts:
Personal expenses for the individual, for example food and clothes.
Shared common expenses for the household, for example utility bills and newspapers.
I'll calculate the levels for a single adult.
Living: The guideline from Socialstyrelsen is one bedroom, one kitchen and one livingroom - roughly 60 square meters.
Electricity 1500 kWh per year
Monthly Personal Expenses - €410, in the following categories:
Media: €50 - subscription of a local newspaper and a book once in a while
Food €170 per month - A weekly menu with three servings of chicken, four servings of cod, two servings of halloumi and four vegetarian servings. Oatmeal porridge for breakfast
Clothes €40 - one sweater, or a pair of pants, or a half dozen of underwear.
20 - buying a cheap smartphone every second year and having a low cost subscription
50 SEK - buying one bottle of schampoo or toothpaste every month
The lowest acceptable living standard of any human being in Sweden exceeds by far the highest emission levels according that comply with the 1.5C target, according to the IPCC.
Does this mean that IPCC are too aggressive with their targets? No, we need to reach net-zero emissions and stop increasing the CO2e levels in the atmosphere now. (ASAP is too slow and failing can't be an option.
Should I aim for a below-subsidence lifestyle? No, it is an important target that you can lead a life on an acceptable standard. Especially with children.
What should I do? I'll aim for personal emissions between 50% and 75% of the Swedish average. The latest numbers I have from SCB (Statistics Sweden) indicates an average of 5.4 tonnes per person of emissions. Thus, my target will be between 2.7 and 4 tonnes of CO2e.
If you think that number is too high and that my ambition is too relaxed, you can reduce my target by reducing the average emission levels in Sweden.
Two years has passed since my last annual update... This year, a lot of my focus has been escalation of the unjustifiable war against Ukraine. Even if Sweden is not directly involved in the battles of the war, the aggressor has made explicit demands that Sweden (along with Finland, Moldova, Ukraine and several NATO and EU members) shall be subjugated to the aggressor. We are all affected by this war and we must do everything needed to help Ukraine stop the aggressions and make Europe a continent under the rule of law again. My reaction to the war has focused on four areas: Energy efficiency - This year, I'm not the only one to be obsessed with energy efficiency. I have been reducing my electricity consumption to offload the power grid and to prevent blackouts. More about that below. Supporting refugees - I have re-joined a volunteer group in my area, that is giving support to refugees from Ukraine and other countries. I've also been a team leader in that group. Financial sup...
Promise One year ago, I promised to reduce my personal consumption based CO2e emissions from 4.7 tonnes to 3.8 tonnes. Result In 2019, my personal consumption based CO2e emissions was 2.9 tonnes - a reduction of 1.8 tonnes. Together with the public emissions of 3.8 tonnes, that gives a total of 6.6 tonnes of CO2e. I've honored my NYE resolution but my emission levels are far from sustainable. The average in Sweden is some 6 tonnes of personal consumption based CO2e emissions, so I'm a bit below the average but still higher than the one tonne target from IPCC. My emission levels are not OK! However, I've reached the conclusion that this issue is larger than the sum of individuals and their actions. While some individuals stop flying, others keep flying and governments build new airports and expand existing ones. Individuals buy electric bikes, while governments builds pipelines and can't decide whether to expand oil refineries or not. Get me right - the con...
After 16 months, our solar plant has generated 18 000 kWh of electricity. I expect the savings to be more than €3 000 for 2022. As I'm obsessed with global heating and avoiding CO2e emissions, I'm interested in how much CO2e we have avoided. Let's dig into the numbers: According to Sungrow - 1 kg CO2e per kWh The Inverter producer (Sungrow) compares the electricity generation with coal-burning electricity. Combining 1 kg Coal gives ~3.7 kg carbon dioxide and gives up to 9 kWh. If the thermic energy is converted to electricity with 33% efficiency, one kWh will generate 1.2 kg CO2e. That would cancel the emissions from my entire family's personal consumption, if that number would reflect our savings. But it doesn't. Averaging to the Swedish Electricity Mix ~13 g CO2e per kWh Luckily, the electricity production in Sweden is almost coal-free. Most of the electricity is generated from wind and water, and also extracted from nuclear nucular power. What is the CO2e cos...
Kommentarer
Skicka en kommentar